So, here we are in 2026, and I'm still thinking about that bombshell Larian Studios dropped. Remember when they announced they were walking away from Dungeons & Dragons after Baldur's Gate 3? It was like watching a chef who just won a Michelin star decide to open a food truck selling something completely different. The gaming world was stunned. Baldur's Gate 3 wasn't just a success; it was a cultural phenomenon, a game that redefined what a CRPG could be. The logical next step, the safe corporate playbook move, would have been to immediately greenlight Baldur's Gate 4. The fans were begging for it, the money was practically guaranteed, and Wizards of the Coast would have been thrilled. But Larian said no. They chose to walk away from the golden handcuffs of a major licensed IP to return to their own baby: Divinity.
For me, that decision is as refreshing as it is terrifying. It's a move that goes against every fiber of modern triple-A game development logic. Former Rockstar lead developer Obbe Vermeij perfectly captured the sentiment when he called it a "bold move" and "very risky." He knows a thing or two about being tied to a mega-franchise, having worked on Grand Theft Auto III, IV, and San Andreas. He saw firsthand how a hit like GTA can become a creative black hole, sucking all resources and innovative ideas into its orbit. As he put it, "The reality is if you have a studio that has one mega successful game, it just doesn't make sense to do any wild changes... Whatever weird ideas you have, we really should put them into GTA."
And that's exactly the trap Larian avoided. Think about the industry landscape. We've seen franchise after franchise milked for every last drop. Fourteen mainline Assassin's Creed games? It's a testament to a formula that works, but also to a fear of stepping off the well-trodden path. Rockstar itself operates on a clear, if lengthy, rotation between Grand Theft Auto and Red Dead Redemption. These cycles are so massive and time-consuming that betting on a brand-new, unproven IP becomes an almost unthinkable financial gamble.
So why did Larian do it? The reasons were, as they stated, simple yet profound:
-
Creative Ownership: Working under Wizards of the Coast and Hasbro meant their vision was ultimately subject to another company's approval. Returning to Divinity means they own every pixel, every storyline, every character. They answer only to their players and their own creative compass.
-
Artistic Freedom: Baldur's Gate 3 was a masterpiece set in someone else's sandbox (albeit a fantastic one). With Divinity, they get to build the sandbox from the ground up, with their own rules, lore, and magic systems. No lore bibles to strictly adhere to, just pure imagination.
-
Long-Term Legacy: This is about building something that is unequivocally theirs. Divinity is Larian's legacy IP. Nurturing it after such a massive success with a licensed title is like a master gardener choosing to tend their own rare orchid hybrid instead of continuing to maintain the pristine, popular municipal rose garden.
The risk, of course, is monumental. The gaming audience is fickle. Walking away from the built-in, massive fanbase of D&D is like a bestselling author deciding their next book won't be a sequel, but a completely new genre published under a pseudonym. There's no guarantee the audience will follow. The financial safety net is gone. Every decision, every success, and every failure will be solely on Larian's shoulders.
But therein lies the beauty and the bravery. In an industry increasingly dominated by sequels, remakes, and live-service giants, Larian's pivot back to Divinity is a powerful statement. It says that for some creators, the ultimate success isn't just maximizing profit from a known quantity; it's the freedom to create something new from a place of pure passion. It's a gamble that treats creative integrity not as a luxury, but as the core engine of the studio.
As a player, this gives me immense hope. It means the next Divinity game won't be made because a spreadsheet said it would sell 10 million copies. It will be made because Swen Vincke and his team have stories they are burning to tell in their own world. That passion was palpable in every corner of Baldur's Gate 3, and imagining it unleashed in a universe of their own total design is incredibly exciting. Their move is a rare and precious thing in modern gaming: a leap of faith based on art over algorithm. And in 2026, that's a risk worth celebrating.